Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4000 14,024 User benchmarks, average bench 24% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	31.2% Below average	Memory 43.5 1-Core 56.9 2-Core 113 40% 71 Pts	4-Core 110 8-Core 112 15% 111 Pts	64-Core 109 7% 109 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1E50 8003) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6813 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.83% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 1.9 Parallax 2.2 2% 2 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 3.5 2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.83% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Dogfish 256GB 256GB 890 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 202GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1127B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 32 26 31 25 34 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.9% Below average	Read 285 Write 59.7 Mixed 26.6 SusWrite 28.1 21% 99.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.6 4K Write 34.5 4K Mixed 16.3 48% 18.8 MB/s	DQ Read 108 DQ Write 52.1 DQ Mixed 1.5 22% 53.7 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x2GB 5,404 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	17.9% Very poor	MC Read 5.1 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 6.3 19% 6.5 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 3.4 10% 3.47 GB/s	Latency 187 21% 187 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4020IntelBench 21%, 5,047 samples	9x
Celeron N4000IntelBench 24%, 14,024 samples	7x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	16x

RAM
123456789012345678 2x2GBABCDBench 19%, 5,404 samples	9x
123456789012345678 1x4GBABCDBench 15%, 288 samples	7x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16