Clevo W35_37ET

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemClevo W35_37ET  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO W35_37ET
Memory21.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 26 '21 at 18:49
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 86.2
2-Core 167
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 432
45% 362 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Clevo(1558 3700) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.15% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 10.9
Parallax 2.7
3% 5.8 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.6
3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.15%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
869GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 435 446 424 418 368 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 436
Mixed 381
SusWrite 418
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 69.2
4K Mixed 36.9
122% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 291
240% 343 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 125%
ASM1153U ASM1153USB3.0TOS 525GB
95GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 235 238 234 231 227 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
147% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 226
Mixed 203
SusWrite 233
297% 212 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 21.6
4K Mixed 16.4
1,344% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 17.4
DQ Write 34.3
DQ Mixed 23.1
2,017% 24.9 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR3 1600 C10 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
54.6% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 17.5
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 17.4
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W35_37ET Builds (Compare 94 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Clevo W35_37ET

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $520
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback