Asus F1A55-M LX3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive10.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus F1A55-M LX3  (all builds)
Memory0.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150330
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 26 '21 at 13:46
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 631
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
46.4% Average
Memory 68.9
1-Core 42.1
2-Core 79.6
42% 63.5 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 150
19% 145 Pts
64-Core 163
10% 163 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IR-SSDPR-S25A-240 240GB
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM91.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 40 38 38 37 43 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
10.1% Very poor
Read 114
Write 108
Mixed 94.9
SusWrite 40.4
20% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.9
10% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 102%
Samsung HM641JX 640GB
207GB free
Firmware: 2AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 44 42 40 41 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 19.5
Write 43.5
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 44.2
24% 32 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
62% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.5% Very poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 5.1
19% 6.57 GB/s
SC Read 0.2
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 0.2
5% 1.73 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A55-M LX3 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A55-M LX3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback