Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-10105F 14,843 User benchmarks, average bench 82% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	85.9% Excellent	Memory 90.4 1-Core 129 2-Core 250 88% 156 Pts	4-Core 439 8-Core 636 67% 537 Pts	64-Core 692 43% 692 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$31 14,082 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 330 302 286 286 284 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 508 Write 344 Mixed 328 SusWrite 303 83% 371 MB/s	4K Read 38.4 4K Write 93.1 4K Mixed 45.9 166% 59.1 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 341 DQ Mixed 263 224% 328 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 128%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB 40,802 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 252GB free Firmware: 03.01A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 33 34 33 34 32 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	24.9% Poor	Read 54.5 Write 31.9 Mixed 52.1 SusWrite 32.1 32% 42.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.2 56% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 1x8GB 18,648 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	48.5% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 14.3 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 16.2 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 66.7 60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 37,718 samples	398x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	361x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	335x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	227x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	151x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	119x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	162x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	83x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 88%, 35,395 samples	76x

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $200

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16