Asus M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD
Memory3.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 25 '21 at 21:16
Run Duration350 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 106
2-Core 210
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 542
56% 451 Pts
64-Core 551
34% 551 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.23% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 6.4
3% 4.2 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 4.7
4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.23%
Great: 3%
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.8% Above average
Lighting 81.9
Reflection 88.2
Parallax 79.6
67% 83.2 fps
MRender 65.9
Gravity 78.7
Splatting 0.3
35% 48.3 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso SATAIII 480GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0918A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 225 219 14 4.6 5.7 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.8% Below average
Read 233
Write 193
Mixed 225
SusWrite 81
41% 183 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 0.3
73% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 16.8
DQ Mixed 0.5
18% 45.4 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 101%
Intenso Sata III 125GB
47GB free
Firmware: N1126K
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 275 275 272 252 231 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 486
Write 274
Mixed 282
SusWrite 264
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 85.5
4K Mixed 40
140% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 64.3
DQ Mixed 104
94% 149 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 98%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
193GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 99 105 170 160 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 21.3
Write 108
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 124
50% 69 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 107%
IET VIRTUAL-DISK 1.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 25 24 25 25 22 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21% Poor
Read 48.4
Write 29.7
Mixed 36.2
SusWrite 23.7
26% 34.5 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
211% 1.63 MB/s
IET VIRTUAL-DISK 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 24 24 25 23 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 29.8
Write 35.8
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 23.8
16% 23 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
212% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
52.8% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 15.9
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 14.7
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD Builds (Compare 537 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $222
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback