Toshiba SATELLITE C70-C-10X

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C70-C-10X (all builds)
Motherboard	FF40 0681
Memory	7.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit renk,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150701
Uptime	7.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 25 '21 at 11:12
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	32%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-5200U 107,407 User benchmarks, average bench 42% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	47% Average	Memory 67.4 1-Core 80.3 2-Core 143 57% 96.9 Pts	4-Core 149 8-Core 196 22% 172 Pts	64-Core 193 12% 193 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Toshiba(1179 F832) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126 Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	3.86% Terrible	Lighting 4.6 Reflection 9 Parallax 5.8 4% 6.47 fps	MRender 5.4 Gravity 4.5 Splatting 5 4% 4.97 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.86% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB 129,581 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 813GB free (System drive) Firmware: JA0OA700 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 95 94 90 89 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	55.6% Above average	Read 103 Write 91.1 Mixed 38.8 SusWrite 90.9 59% 80.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 57%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 21GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 3.1 3.6 4.2 3.5 3.6 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	8.07% Terrible	Read 28.5 Write 3 Mixed 9 SusWrite 4.1 11% 11.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 2 106% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.07% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston TSB16D3LS1MNG/4G Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 12GB 116 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.7% Below average	MC Read 13.4 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 10.9 36% 12.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 12.7 34% 12 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE C70-C-10X Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C70-C-10X

CPU
Core i5-5200UIntelBench 42%, 107,407 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce 930MNvidiaBench 8%, 4,490 samples	1x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	1x

RAM
TSB16D3LS1MNG/4G Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 12GBKingstonBench 41%, 116 samples	1x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 M471B1G73QH0-YK0 12GBSamsungBench 40%, 1,781 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Toshiba SATELLITE C70-C-10X

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C70-C-10X

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)