HP Pavilion Sleekbook 15 PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Sleekbook 15 PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18FD
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120810
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 24 '21 at 22:22
Run Duration346 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3217U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Memory 57.4
1-Core 45.9
2-Core 84.4
39% 62.6 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 117
16% 119 Pts
64-Core 121
8% 121 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 18FD) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.03% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 6.9
Parallax 2.6
3% 4.4 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.5
3% 3.67 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.03%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS500GSSD220Q 500GB
377GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 310 371 345 358 356 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 440
Write 347
Mixed 354
SusWrite 344
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 30.6
4K Mixed 14.8
56% 19.7 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 39.7
62% 115 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F Kingston 99U5469-041.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
43.9% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 16.8
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 10.4
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Sleekbook 15 PC Builds (Compare 215 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Sleekbook 15 PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback