Acer Nitro N50-110

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics41.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Nitro N50-110  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Nitro N50-110
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1334 x 750 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191009
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateDec 24 '21 at 21:34
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 63.7
1-Core 124
2-Core 262
79% 150 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 751
79% 633 Pts
64-Core 749
46% 749 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Sapphire(174B A548) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.7% Average
Lighting 53.5
Reflection 55.4
Parallax 49.4
44% 52.8 fps
MRender 43.3
Gravity 50.3
Splatting 45.9
38% 46.5 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pcie SSD 512GB
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM00.5 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 480 365 379 379 258 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1,082
Write 1,294
Mixed 1,092
SusWrite 326
213% 948 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 70.9
247% 92.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,037
DQ Write 627
DQ Mixed 808
608% 824 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 177%
Great: 267%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS8266.M8FD Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
49.9% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 17.1
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 17.9
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro N50-110 Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

System: Acer Nitro N50-110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $390
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback