Biostar A70MD PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive53.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardBiostar A70MD PRO  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160616
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 24 '21 at 20:07
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
42.5% Average
Memory 61
1-Core 56.8
2-Core 105
45% 74.2 Pts
4-Core 150
8-Core 93.9
18% 122 Pts
64-Core 154
10% 154 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.30.23.01
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 58.1
Reflection 59.6
71% 58.8 fps
Poor: 37% Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SATA SSD 128GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM02D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 258 274 271 274 268 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 322
Write 278
Mixed 205
SusWrite 261
60% 267 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 44.1
4K Mixed 18.3
74% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 22.9
DQ Write 65.7
DQ Mixed 23.7
24% 37.4 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 72%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70
907GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 103 104 101 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 99.5
Write 102
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 102
65% 88.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99P5474-013.AOOLF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
30.1% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 12.4
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 8.5
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A70MD PRO Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A70MD PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback