AMI TC-J1X00D16-L

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive54.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAMI TC-J1X00D16-L  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190612
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 24 '21 at 13:54
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J1900
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Memory 46.7
1-Core 18.2
2-Core 36.4
24% 33.8 Pts
4-Core 72.6
8-Core 71.7
10% 72.1 Pts
64-Core 71.6
4% 71.6 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX400-128-G2 128GB
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMP1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 234 88 100 112 227 MB/s
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.8% Above average
Read 250
Write 79.1
Mixed 212
SusWrite 164
39% 176 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 24
88% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 142
115% 163 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 97%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
3GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 7.2 9 10 11 9.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
5.13% Terrible
Read 20.7
Write 7.8
Mixed 11
SusWrite 8.9
15% 12.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.13%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Goodram GR1600S364L11S/4G 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.5% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 6.7
21% 7.5 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 4.4
11% 3.93 GB/s
Latency 174
23% 174 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback