Lenovo 10MAS05300

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 10MAS05300  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3102
Memory14.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170512
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 24 '21 at 12:17
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600-$133
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 79
1-Core 118
2-Core 229
79% 142 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 451
60% 451 Pts
64-Core 452
28% 452 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Legend(17AA 3102) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
3.71% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 0.3
6% 4.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.71%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1029A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 44 22 14 44 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 415
Write 345
Mixed 286
SusWrite 37.7
60% 271 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 13.9
4K Mixed 0.3
48% 13.6 MB/s
DQ Read 25.6
DQ Write 5.1
DQ Mixed 0.4
4% 10.4 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
DDR4 8GB 3200MHz 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.4% Average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 12.2
38% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10MAS05300 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10MAS05300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback