Acer Veriton M680G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Veriton M680G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton M680G
Memory9.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 24 '21 at 08:39
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User MLT-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$72
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
58% Above average
Memory 84.5
1-Core 73.6
2-Core 132
60% 96.6 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 211
26% 196 Pts
64-Core 253
16% 253 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.49% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 5.9
Parallax 4.3
3% 4.8 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5.1
4% 4.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.49%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
INTENSO 512GB
400GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1223A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 214 186 181 217 192 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.3% Average
Read 240
Write 207
Mixed 52
SusWrite 199
39% 175 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 46.8
4K Mixed 1
49% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 0.6
51% 125 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 96%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
718GB free
Firmware: AX1P4M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 90 89 95 93 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 99.8
Write 99.4
Mixed 30.7
SusWrite 92.2
58% 80.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
74% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GU512303EP0202 0707 GU512303EP0202 12GB
1334, 1334, 1334, 1334 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
39.4% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 14.5
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 11.3
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton M680G Builds (Compare 84 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M680G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback