Asus P5QL-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics2.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive16.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P5QL-E  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1440 x 900 x 65536 colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090911
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 13 '15 at 05:02
Run Duration298 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89
LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 32.7
2-Core 84.2
26% 58.4 Pts
4-Core 86.8
8-Core 93.2
12% 90 Pts
64-Core 95.9
6% 95.9 Pts
Poor: 24% Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI HD 3650
MSI(1462 1260) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.13% Terrible
Lighting 2.57
Reflection 4.62
Parallax 1.19
2% 2.79 fps
MRender 2.62
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 3.91
2% 2.54 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.13%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ VERTEX2 80GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.37 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 126
Write 42.7
Mixed 57.9
16% 75.5 MB/s
4K Read 7.01
4K Write 19.1
4K Mixed 4.18
26% 10.1 MB/s
DQ Read 11.8
DQ Write 34.6
DQ Mixed 5.91
10% 17.4 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 41%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
432GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 89.5
Write 101
Mixed 62.1
62% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.14
4K Write 0.26
4K Mixed 0.11
23% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 62%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 2GB
1GB free, PID 1607
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
5.47% Terrible
Read 20.6
Write 5.57
Mixed 8.7
12% 11.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.79
4K Write 0.04
4K Mixed 0.05
21% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.47%
Great: 6%
Typical P5QL-E Builds (Compare 143 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5QL-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $306
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback