Asus S400CA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus S400CA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK S400CA
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '21 at 19:31
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3317U-$225
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Memory 73
1-Core 68.9
2-Core 103
52% 81.5 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 161
22% 164 Pts
64-Core 166
10% 166 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 10FD) 2.5GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.97% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 2.6
3% 2.63 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.5
3% 3.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.97%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
902GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 367 366 370 380 370 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 455
Write 432
Mixed 370
SusWrite 378
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 40.7
4K Mixed 28.9
94% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 257
214% 312 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida 8502 PSD34G1600L81S 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.4% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 17.5
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 15.5
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 94.5
42% 94.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S400CA Builds (Compare 353 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus S400CA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback