Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4005 1,572 User benchmarks, average bench 28% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	33.2% Below average	Memory 46.7 1-Core 60.4 2-Core 117 43% 74.8 Pts	4-Core 115 8-Core 120 16% 117 Pts	64-Core 114 7% 114 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 34%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 36ED) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9030 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	2.17% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 2.4 2% 2.07 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 5.4 3% 3.5 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.17% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013) 72,354 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 424GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03.01A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 41 53 42 56 70 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	44.8% Average	Read 108 Write 37.4 Mixed 54.9 SusWrite 47.6 46% 62.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 63%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 10GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 5.5 4.8 4.8 5.4 4.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	5.31% Terrible	Read 22.1 Write 3.7 Mixed 9.7 SusWrite 5 11% 10.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.31% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GB 48,985 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.2% Very poor	MC Read 4.7 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 6 17% 6 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 4.1 12% 4.03 GB/s	Latency 174 23% 174 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 41%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J4005IntelBench 28%, 1,572 samples	11x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	11x

SSD
CS900 240GBPNY $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	1x

RAM
RMSA3270ME86H9F-26 1x4GBRamaxelBench 20%, 135 samples	5x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	4x
M471A5143SB1-CRC 1x4GBSamsungBench 35%, 2,061 samples	2x

Value: 31% - Below average

Total price: $20