Intel S2600STB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel S2600STB  (all builds)
Memory238.8 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '21 at 16:09
Run Duration297 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 4110
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 71.7
1-Core 79.6
2-Core 153
59% 101 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 584
52% 439 Pts
64-Core 1,435
89% 1,435 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
EVGA(3842 6598) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 167
Reflection 186
Parallax 176
136% 176 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 180
Splatting 127
119% 148 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
701GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 421 427 425 374 385 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 430
Mixed 395
SusWrite 404
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 74.8
4K Mixed 40.1
138% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 297
239% 337 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 102%
Great: 125%
Intel SSDPEKKW020T8 2TB
799GB free
Firmware: 002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1162 1186 1029 1011 1009 998 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 1,912
Write 1,268
Mixed 1,186
SusWrite 1,066
303% 1,358 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 97.9
4K Mixed 56.3
190% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 701
DQ Write 479
DQ Mixed 265
285% 481 MB/s
Poor: 176%
This bench: 227%
Great: 312%
WD WD102KRYZ-01A5AB0 10TB
8TB free
Firmware: 1H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 143 147 148 147 141 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 79% Great: 136%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 239 246 242 243 242 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 76% Great: 136%
USB Flash Disk 2GB
2GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6.5 6.5 6.4 6.5 6.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
4.68% Terrible
Read 15
Write 3.8
Mixed 3.2
SusWrite 6.4
8% 7.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.68%
Great: 8%
Verbatim Store n Go V3 USB 3.0 128GB-$51
115GB free, PID 0243
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 87.8
Write 15.5
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 10.4
47% 42.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 2.1
119% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K43BB1-CTD 16x16GB
16 of 16 slots used
256GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
88.8% Excellent
MC Read 35
MC Write 40.8
MC Mixed 34.6
105% 36.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.5
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 97.6
41% 97.6 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 191%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S2600STB Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 141%
UFO

Motherboard: Intel S2600STB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $280
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback