MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive191% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C84
MotherboardMSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)  (all builds)
Memory56.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210926
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '21 at 11:36
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G-$165
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 88.7
1-Core 170
2-Core 338
106% 199 Pts
4-Core 670
8-Core 1321
118% 996 Pts
64-Core 1,600
99% 1,600 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 107%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 1636) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.12.1
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
20.2% Poor
Lighting 25.7
Reflection 24.4
Parallax 35.9
21% 28.7 fps
MRender 17.8
Gravity 27.6
Splatting 22.9
19% 22.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 499GB
323GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1314 1398 1334 1070 520 502 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 1,849
Write 1,866
Mixed 1,039
SusWrite 1023
324% 1,444 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 62.6
4K Mixed 42.7
140% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 381
247% 293 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 191%
Great: 308%
WDC WD40EZAZ-00SF3B0 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 177 179 178 180 178 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 196
Write 174
Mixed 113
SusWrite 178
37% 165 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 12.2
4K Mixed 1.1
28% 8.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1.3
DQ Write 10.5
DQ Mixed 1.1
2% 4.3 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMUD416E82-3600D 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
118% Outstanding
MC Read 45.3
MC Write 43.1
MC Mixed 38
120% 42.1 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 52.4
SC Mixed 37.5
111% 39 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 118%
Great: 141%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) Builds (Compare 7,466 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,386
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback