Asus X756UV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 95% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus X756UV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X756UV
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit, ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190417
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateDec 23 '21 at 07:54
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 44%
CPU Throttled 95%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6198DU
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 85.5
1-Core 77.5
2-Core 141
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 213
28% 213 Pts
64-Core 211
13% 211 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 510
Asus(1043 114E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
2.52% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 9.9
Parallax 3
2% 5.1 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 5.1
4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.52%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC600512G 512GB
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S4500105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 353 378 380 362 310 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 398
Write 359
Mixed 316
SusWrite 354
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 46.4
158% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 263
219% 316 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 102%
Great: 130%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
902GB free
Firmware: JA0OA560
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 93.1
Mixed 34
47% 63.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA451S6AFR8N-TF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
69.1% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 22.1
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 19.7
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X756UV Builds (Compare 62 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X756UV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback