Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 137%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI  (all builds)
Memory60.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '21 at 05:55
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 5800X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$354
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 90.6
1-Core 179
2-Core 350
110% 207 Pts
4-Core 684
8-Core 1,344
120% 1,014 Pts
64-Core 2,941
182% 2,941 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 109%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 116
Parallax 126
99% 121 fps
MRender 183
Gravity 112
Splatting 106
106% 134 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,879
Write 2,533
Mixed 2,369
509% 2,260 MB/s
4K Read 83.6
4K Write 197
4K Mixed 113
375% 131 MB/s
DQ Read 1379
DQ Write 697
DQ Mixed 1,190
843% 1,089 MB/s
Poor: 182% Great: 389%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
493GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1848 1851 1586 1460 1464 1464 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
359% Outstanding
Read 2,578
Write 1,796
Mixed 1,788
SusWrite 1,612
435% 1,944 MB/s
4K Read 69.9
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 96.9
323% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,422
DQ Write 1,157
DQ Mixed 1,251
947% 1,276 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 359%
Great: 410%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$200
1.5TB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 464 462 462 461 461 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 450
Mixed 412
SusWrite 462
103% 458 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 98
4K Mixed 49
166% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 109%
Great: 122%
Seagate ST10000VN0008-2JJ101 10TB
9TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 220 221 223 223 223 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 36% Great: 99%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
14GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 9.2 9.3 9.3 8.6 9.3 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
5.48% Terrible
Read 18.2
Write 6
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 8.9
11% 9.33 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.48%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905734-003.A00G 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
148% Outstanding
MC Read 88.6
MC Write 40.8
MC Mixed 42.6
164% 57.3 GB/s
SC Read 30.5
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 38.9
89% 31.2 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 148%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI Builds (Compare 6,672 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $708
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback