MSI A58M-E33 (MS-7721)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive50.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7721
MotherboardMSI A58M-E33 (MS-7721)  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 22 '21 at 20:51
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
49.8% Average
Memory 64.6
1-Core 72.3
2-Core 130
53% 89 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 203
27% 204 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250
Dell(1028 2120) 2GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.1
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
7.2% Terrible
Lighting 8.9
Reflection 11.2
Parallax 14.9
7% 11.7 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 9.3
Splatting 8.3
7% 8.7 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.2%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 138 42 57 62 59 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.5% Above average
Read 217
Write 159
Mixed 175
SusWrite 92
36% 161 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 59.5
4K Mixed 21.6
97% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 123
102% 147 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
822GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 168 170 171 172 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 153
Mixed 81.9
SusWrite 170
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1600C9-8GSR F3-1600C9-8GSR 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.3% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 7.1
19% 6.8 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 7.5
20% 7.13 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A58M-E33 (MS-7721) Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A58M-E33 (MS-7721)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $236
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback