Intel DH55TC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemINTEL_ DH55TC__
MotherboardIntel DH55TC  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111206
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateSep 04 '17 at 12:25
Run Duration312 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 550-$110
XU1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
41.8% Average
Memory 68.1
1-Core 74.6
2-Core 94.1
50% 78.9 Pts
4-Core 94.2
8-Core 84.9
12% 89.6 Pts
64-Core 97.9
6% 97.9 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
3.31% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 4.23
Parallax 2.78
3% 3.66 fps
MRender 5.86
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.09
4% 4.41 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.31%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175
172GB free
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.6% Below average
Read 252
Write 84.7
Mixed 115
33% 151 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 23.3
4K Mixed 9.24
53% 17.2 MB/s
DQ Read 87.2
DQ Write 37.7
DQ Mixed 20.9
26% 48.6 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 92%
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
159GB free
Firmware: M0CR021 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.8% Poor
Read 259
Write 93.3
Mixed 131
35% 161 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 3.43
4K Mixed 3.16
39% 9.48 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 95%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.6% Above average
Read 266
Write 209
Mixed 149
46% 208 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 38.1
4K Mixed 26.9
97% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 83.4
DQ Mixed 46.7
49% 81.3 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC43
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 113
Write 138
Mixed 94.4
86% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.19
24% 0.19 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
Seagate Momentus XT 7200 RPM 2.5" 750GB-$55
608GB free
Firmware: SM12 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 93.7
Write 86.6
Mixed 39.1
54% 73.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 0.47
4K Mixed 0.22
45% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 99U5471-001.A00LF 99U5471-020.A00LF 99U5471-001.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.1% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 7.5
20% 7.07 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7.2
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DH55TC Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel DH55TC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback