HP 700-349

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics87.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive41.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 700-349  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 21 '21 at 21:11
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 48%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
44% Average
Memory 39.9
1-Core 83.5
2-Core 174
52% 99.1 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 254
36% 268 Pts
64-Core 366
23% 366 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 44%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 118
Parallax 108
89% 112 fps
MRender 96.3
Gravity 108
Splatting 104
84% 103 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 256GB-$68
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 162 81 73 79 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 348
Write 159
Mixed 123
SusWrite 90.8
40% 180 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 40.6
4K Mixed 6.6
52% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 80.1
DQ Mixed 120
98% 144 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
299GB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 182 181 177 181 174 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 151
Write 121
Mixed 73.4
SusWrite 177
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B1G73DB0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
22.9% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 7.6
24% 8.33 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 4.9
16% 5.5 GB/s
Latency 203
20% 203 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700-349 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP 700-349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $310
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback