TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 36643D9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 36643D9  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130524
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 21 '21 at 18:35
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$140
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 98.5
2-Core 184
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 465
47% 379 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑
This bench: 69.5%
 Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8626)
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.6% Poor
Lighting 37.3
Reflection 41.6
Parallax 38.8
30% 39.2 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 39.2
Splatting 27.8
28% 35 fps
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 29.6%
 Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HX128GSSDSATA3 128GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0421B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 208 224 222 226 226 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.7% Average
Read 259
Write 220
Mixed 168
SusWrite 209
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 39.7
4K Mixed 10.5
59% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 68.1
79% 133 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑
This bench: 47.7%
 Great: 89%
WDC WD40EFAX-68JH4N0 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 123 123 124 122 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Read 131
Write 119
Mixed 66.9
SusWrite 120
24% 109 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 1.1
15% 5.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1.6
DQ Write 13.4
DQ Mixed 2.3
3% 5.77 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑
This bench: 16.9%
 Great: 38%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$47
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 210 210 213 213 212 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix DX8GDDR3U1600 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
50.4% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15.6
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 15.5
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 50.4%
 Great: 58%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 36643D9 Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 36643D9

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel  $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples12x
Core i3-3220Intel  $60Bench 52%, 71,790 samples5x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples5x
GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples6x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples6x
RX 550AMD  $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples3x
SSD
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples3x
1000GB 1TBSSDBench 83%, 25 samples3x
SSDPR-CX400-256-G2 256GBBench 75%, 1,916 samples3x
RAM
DX8GDDR3U1600 2x8GBSamsungBench 49%, 167 samples4x
RMR5030MN68F9F1600 0443 RMR5030EF68F9W1600 8GBUnknownBench 51%, 36 samples3x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback