Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics69.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 21 '21 at 16:39
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 80.8
1-Core 139
2-Core 277
90% 165 Pts
4-Core 528
8-Core 968
90% 748 Pts
64-Core 1,211
75% 1,211 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.84
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.9% Good
Lighting 92.5
Reflection 87.7
Parallax 76.8
75% 85.7 fps
MRender 64.7
Gravity 79.9
Splatting 72
59% 72.2 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
T-force 1TB 1TB
676GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02K0S6OA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 438 391 430 435 425 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 467
Mixed 408
SusWrite 418
102% 451 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 56
185% 66.1 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 130
162% 286 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 120%
Great: 109%
Sabrent Rocket Q 1TB
106GB free
Firmware: RKT30Q.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 271 264 130 167 154 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 1,373
Write 1,760
Mixed 866
SusWrite 192
234% 1,048 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 6.4
74% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 187
138% 185 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 305%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
20GB free
Firmware: JU004C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 86 85 86 92 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 126
Write 127
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 84.6
72% 98 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 0.7
258% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 79%
ST310005 24AS 1TB
60GB free, PID 0611
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 39 39 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Read 39.4
Write 37.3
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 39
49% 36.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
78% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 37.4
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 26.8
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 37.6
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $753
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback