Intel X58M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive40.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardIntel X58M  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 21 '21 at 06:03
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5672
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 89
1-Core 69
2-Core 154
63% 104 Pts
4-Core 273
8-Core 392
42% 333 Pts
64-Core 396
24% 396 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 80%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ocz-vertex2 3.5 115GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 54 54 50 53 53 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 186
Write 71.4
Mixed 105
SusWrite 54.5
23% 104 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 47.5
4K Mixed 21.9
82% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 75.6
DQ Mixed 86.2
69% 97.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 49%
Hitachi UltraStar 7K4000 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: MJ6OA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 152 151 152 152 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 134
Write 142
Mixed 65.6
SusWrite 151
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
169% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Winbond W25X/Q32 44GB
4266, 33 MHz
8192, 36864 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
45.1% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 13.8
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X58M Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel X58M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback