Asus B85M-G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive67% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus B85M-G  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140220
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 20 '21 at 19:06
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 76.8
1-Core 90.4
2-Core 184
67% 117 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 348
46% 347 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier Pro SP920 128GB-$35
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 168 116 52 54 53 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
67% Good
Read 408
Write 193
Mixed 200
SusWrite 104
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 30.7
113% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 64
89% 165 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 67%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
260GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 142 145 143 145 147 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 168
Write 126
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 144
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 112%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
244GB free, PID 7000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 76 77 77 78 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 128
Write 106
Mixed 80
SusWrite 75.9
126% 97.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.7
195% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160B.C16F 1302 PSD38G16002 1315 CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
47.5% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 14
48% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 13.3
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-G Builds (Compare 5,953 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-G - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $317
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback