Medion P6634

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMedion P6634  (all builds)
MotherboardMedion P6634
Memory3.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '21 at 10:32
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2430M-$53
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Memory 73.3
1-Core 76.7
2-Core 119
55% 89.7 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 171
24% 175 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630M
Device(1B0A 20C8) 1GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
3.16% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 1.9
3% 3.8 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 3.1
3% 4.17 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.16%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso SATAIII 256GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0929A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 229 143 151 125 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 452
Write 387
Mixed 355
SusWrite 183
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 50.7
4K Mixed 19.8
82% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 40.8
84% 163 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5273DH0-CK0 Kingston ACR256X64D3S1333C9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.5% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 16.1
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 13.4
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 93.9
43% 93.9 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6634 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Medion P6634

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback