HP 500-340nr

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.54% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 500-340nr  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B17
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140904
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateSep 03 '17 at 21:23
Run Duration83 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6700 APU (2013 D.Ri)-$130
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Memory 81.6
1-Core 73.5
2-Core 143
60% 99.5 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 222
30% 221 Pts
64-Core 221
14% 221 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 240 + HD 8670D Dual Graphics
Device(1B0A 90D3) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.301.1001.1001
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.54% Terrible
Lighting 8
Reflection 9.31
Parallax 10.2
6% 9.17 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 7.97
Splatting 8.13
7% 8.03 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.54%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
628GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 154
Write 131
Mixed 147
108% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.49
4K Mixed 0.19
72% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.9% Poor
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 6.8
20% 7.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 7.4
18% 6.33 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback