Toshiba Satellite P875

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive69.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite P875  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 19 '21 at 20:10
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Memory 71.8
1-Core 61.9
2-Core 120
52% 84.4 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 324
31% 258 Pts
64-Core 326
20% 326 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640M
Toshiba(1179 FB12) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7654
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
5.51% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 7.4
Parallax 7.7
5% 7.13 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 8.2
Splatting 7.1
6% 7.67 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.51%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$100
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 198 152 151 97 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 469
Write 374
Mixed 190
SusWrite 162
66% 299 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 42
4K Mixed 28
97% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 144
132% 205 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 107%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
869GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 32 30 377 23 23 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 489
Write 429
Mixed 407
SusWrite 129
81% 364 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 50.5
4K Mixed 21.3
90% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 38.5
69% 133 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.M16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
50.1% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.9
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 13.1
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 97.3
41% 97.3 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite P875 Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite P875

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback