Packard EasyNote LV44HC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemPackard EasyNote LV44HC  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 VG70_HC
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131021
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 19 '21 at 18:10
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
48.3% Average
Memory 72.8
1-Core 67.9
2-Core 99.3
51% 80 Pts
4-Core 139
8-Core 151
19% 145 Pts
64-Core 193
12% 193 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 0689) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.13% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 2.7
3% 2.73 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.83 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.13%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dahua C800A SSD 240GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.15.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 58 50 42 43 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 349
Write 118
Mixed 135
SusWrite 51.4
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 31.4
4K Mixed 12
56% 19.7 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 44.2
DQ Mixed 21
33% 64.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 87%
Toshiba MK3252GSX 320GB-$70
297GB free
Firmware: LV010A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 46 55 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 59.3
Write 56.9
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 54.1
38% 51.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AD73I1C1674EV 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
45% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 16.5
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 12.4
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 95
42% 95 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 45%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EasyNote LV44HC Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote LV44HC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $120
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback