Asrock 890GX Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	39.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 890GX Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140106
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 19 '21 at 17:57
Run Duration	269 Seconds
Run User	HRV-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 53% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	56% Above average	Memory 84.9 1-Core 56.8 2-Core 113 54% 84.8 Pts	4-Core 159 8-Core 165 22% 162 Pts	64-Core 222 14% 222 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Gigabyte(1458 3001) CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.20 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	Lighting 53 Reflection 40.4 Parallax 65.4 43% 52.9 fps	MRender 35.1 Gravity 55.2 Splatting 27.8 31% 39.4 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160 11,403 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 46 49 49 51 51 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	45.1% Average	Read 217 Write 123 Mixed 154 SusWrite 48.5 30% 136 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 66.6 4K Mixed 26.4 100% 37.7 MB/s	DQ Read 26.2 DQ Write 100 DQ Mixed 35.5 35% 53.9 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 75%
Intel 320 Series 80GB-$60 4,402 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 31GB free Firmware: 4PC10362 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 55 55 55 54 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	29.8% Poor	Read 178 Write 91.4 Mixed 99.8 SusWrite 54.7 24% 106 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 36.2 4K Mixed 14.4 58% 21.5 MB/s	DQ Read 18.5 DQ Write 48.7 DQ Mixed 20.7 20% 29.3 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 45%
Hitachi HDT725040VLA360 400GB 1,414 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 61GB free Firmware: V5COA7EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 55 55 55 54 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	31.3% Below average	Read 53.8 Write 53.3 Mixed 32.6 SusWrite 54.7 36% 48.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 37%
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46 33,785 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 97GB free Firmware: 3.AAC SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 50 51 52 52 51 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	29.4% Poor	Read 51 Write 22.3 Mixed 34.5 SusWrite 51 29% 39.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 42%
ST500LM0 12 HN-M500MBB 500GB 319 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 461GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 28 29 30 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	17% Very poor	Read 28.7 Write 27.1 Mixed 24.6 SusWrite 28.8 37% 27.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-1600C9-4GAO F3-1600C9-4GAO 8GB 100 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 667, 667 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	33% Below average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 11.9 32% 11.2 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 9.6 22% 7.63 GB/s	Latency 72 56% 72 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 890GX Extreme4 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 890GX Extreme4

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	3x
Phenom II X4 975AMDBench 57%, 1,372 samples	2x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	2x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	2x
HD 5870AMDBench 19%, 10,176 samples	1x
R9 280XAMD $500Bench 35%, 94,130 samples	1x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	2x
Fury 120GBHyperX $160Bench 64%, 11,403 samples	2x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	1x

RAM
F3-1600C9-4GAO F3-1600C9-4GAO 8GBUnknownBench 37%, 100 samples	2x
9905403-442.A00LF 9905403-442.A00LF KHX1600C10D3/4G KHX1600C10D3/4G 16GBKingstonBench 48%, 16 samples	2x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $408

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16