Asus P8Z68 DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics43.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z68 DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory20.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 03 '17 at 18:34
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 92.6
1-Core 127
2-Core 254
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 645
64% 520 Pts
64-Core 647
40% 647 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 83%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Gigabyte(1458 361B) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 385.41
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.9% Average
Lighting 53.6
Reflection 47.6
Parallax 61.9
44% 54.4 fps
MRender 60.8
Gravity 60.5
Splatting 45
44% 55.4 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LE 480GB-$240
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFC12.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 520
Write 356
Mixed 258
83% 378 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 39.7
4K Mixed 9.69
76% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 45.9
84% 169 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 100%
Ocz-vertex2 3.5 90GB
84GB free
Firmware: 1.33 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 136
Write 57.5
Mixed 78.5
20% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 8.35
60% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 94.7
DQ Write 36.4
DQ Mixed 30.5
32% 53.8 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 49%
Ocz-vertex2 3.5 90GB
84GB free
Firmware: 1.35 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 149
Write 116
Mixed 78.1
25% 114 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 49.3
4K Mixed 10.9
70% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 92.7
DQ Write 84.6
DQ Mixed 30.5
39% 69.2 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 49%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
681GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 96.3
Write 99.5
Mixed 9.11
49% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 2.12
4K Mixed 0.44
125% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
50.6% Above average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 17
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68 DELUXE Builds (Compare 417 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68 DELUXE - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $785
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback