Asus P8H61-M PLUS V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M PLUS V2  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20130916
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 19 '21 at 06:05
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$75
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
56.5% Above average
Memory 78.4
1-Core 82.2
2-Core 144
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 202
27% 202 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Asus(1043 83F4) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.91% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.3
1% 0.6 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.4
1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.91%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1126A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 226 130 68 70 62 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.7% Average
Read 225
Write 226
Mixed 200
SusWrite 126
44% 194 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 26.6
4K Mixed 22.4
68% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 162
118% 154 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 88%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
413GB free
Firmware: NY11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 100 90 92 104 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 100
Write 98.5
Mixed 55.3
SusWrite 97.7
64% 88 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-049.A01G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
27.2% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 8.2
25% 8.77 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 7.2
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M PLUS V2 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M PLUS V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $49
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback