Digibras NM70-I

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDigibras NM70-I  (all builds)
MotherboardDigiboard NM70-I
Memory0.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20121130
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 19 '21 at 01:44
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 847-$259
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Memory 57.3
1-Core 23.7
2-Core 51.4
30% 44.1 Pts
4-Core 37.3
8-Core 50.2
6% 43.8 Pts
64-Core 46.5
3% 46.5 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Elitegroup(1019 2111) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver.
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
0.44% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.6 fps
MRender 1.2
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 0.5
1% 0.87 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.44%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
253GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 46 47 42 33 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
23.1% Poor
Read 39.7
Write 15.8
Mixed 13
SusWrite 40.8
20% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.1
30% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 47%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB
252GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 87 78 56 53 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 86.3
Write 86.5
Mixed 49
SusWrite 71.3
54% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Teikon TMT451S6BFR8A-PBHJ 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.9% Very poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 6.3
20% 7.07 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 0.9
11% 3.73 GB/s
Latency 136
30% 136 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NM70-I Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Digibras NM70-I

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $259
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback