Lenovo 80TT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 80TT  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Toronto 5D2
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 18 '21 at 21:04
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium N4200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Memory 30.2
1-Core 46.1
2-Core 89.8
31% 55.4 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 176
24% 179 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Legend(17AA 39FD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4836
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
2.04% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 3.1
2% 2.23 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 3.1
2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.04%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingdian S370 128GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0509A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 29 30 23 34 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 370
Write 317
Mixed 94.3
SusWrite 50
46% 208 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 17
4K Mixed 11.4
38% 12.7 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 41.7
DQ Mixed 0.2
22% 55.7 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KVR16LS11/8 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
24.9% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 8.9
28% 9.67 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.13 GB/s
Latency 253
16% 253 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80TT Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80TT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $250Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback