Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 5% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion KE494AA-ABV dx2290MT (all builds)
Motherboard	ECS Livermore8
Memory	0.4 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20071008
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 18 '21 at 20:28
Run Duration	180 Seconds
Run User	QAT-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 2.66GHz 56 User benchmarks, average bench 22% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	22.3% Poor	Memory 41.2 1-Core 22 2-Core 22.4 21% 28.5 Pts	4-Core 22.7 8-Core 22.6 3% 22.7 Pts	64-Core 22.3 1% 22.3 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4300 14,988 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sapphire(174B E990) 512MB Driver: atidxx32.dll Ver. 8.56.1.16 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.35% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 2.4 Parallax 1.5 2% 1.93 fps	MRender 1.4 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 1.4 1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.35% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 924GB free (System drive) Firmware: JU001C SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 8.9 6.8 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	8.05% Terrible	Read 17.4 Write 19.2 Mixed 11.2 SusWrite 10.6 11% 14.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.2 34% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 8.05% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x1GB 12,162 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 1GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	8.61% Terrible	MC Read 3.3 MC Write 2.3 MC Mixed 2.5 8% 2.7 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 2.6 SC Mixed 0.3 6% 2.1 GB/s	Latency 197 20% 197 ns
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.61% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Core2 Duo E4600IntelBench 34%, 6,872 samples	4x
Celeron 2.66GHzIntelBench 22%, 56 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon HD 4300ATIBench 1%, 14,988 samples	2x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	2x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	1x

RAM
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	5x
1x1GBUnknownBench 17%, 12,162 samples	2x