Sdfsdf sdfsdf

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics167% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive74.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSdfsdf sdfsdf  (all builds)
Motherboardsdfsdf sdfsdf
Memory19.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 17 '21 at 16:09
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 6800-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Memory 92.8
93% 92.8 Pts
Poor: 61% Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-XT-$650
MSI(1462 3951) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 21.12.1
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
167% Outstanding
Lighting 207
Reflection 396
Parallax 441
169% 348 fps
MRender 367
Gravity 156
Splatting 265
213% 263 fps
Poor: 165%
This bench: 167%
Great: 178%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 240GB
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 166 123 89 118 92 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 466
Write 392
Mixed 230
SusWrite 139
68% 307 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 58.5
4K Mixed 33.6
120% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 151
136% 208 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 74%
Red Hat VirtIO 1TB
862GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 186 189 189 189 185 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 186
Mixed 90.4
SusWrite 186
121% 165 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 110%
Great: 111%
Red Hat VirtIO 1TB
642GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1504 814 819 821 819 820 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 37% Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 24GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
146% Outstanding
MC Read 85
MC Write 41.2
MC Mixed 42.8
161% 56.3 GB/s
SC Read 30.2
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 37.3
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 146%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical sdfsdf Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 158%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 165%
UFO

System: Sdfsdf sdfsdf

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $650
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback