Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	0.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-6098P 6,133 User benchmarks, average bench 62% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	63.6% Good	Memory 74.9 1-Core 110 2-Core 198 72% 128 Pts	4-Core 303 8-Core 302 40% 303 Pts	64-Core 303 19% 303 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gigabyte(1458 3525) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.91% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 0.3 1% 0.6 fps	MRender 2.2 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 1.4 1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.91% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CDG-240GB-SSD25 240GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 145GB free (System drive) Firmware: T1130A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 32 66 37 51 52 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	42.9% Average	Read 438 Write 363 Mixed 83.7 SusWrite 55 52% 235 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 50.3 4K Mixed 1.5 63% 24.9 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 1.8 31% 75.1 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend TS1GLK64V6H 1x8GB 1,077 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	32.6% Below average	MC Read 11.4 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 9.7 31% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 10.5 30% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 90.6 44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 15%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i3-6098PIntelBench 62%, 6,133 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon RX 560-BAMDBench 20%, 49,289 samples	1x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	1x

SSD
CDG-240GB-SSD25 240GBBench 57%, 16 samples	1x

RAM
TS1GLK64V6H 1x8GBTranscendBench 30%, 1,077 samples	1x
9905678-024.A00G Corsair CMK8GX4M1D3000C16 12GBKingstonBench 52%, 4 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16