Cirrascale VB1416

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics60.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemCirrascale VB1416  (all builds)
MotherboardGIGABYTE GA-7PESH2
Memory123.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 17 '21 at 01:31
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 77.9
1-Core 95.2
2-Core 185
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 700
62% 526 Pts
64-Core 2,265
140% 2,265 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
60.9% Good
Lighting 74.6
Reflection 127
Parallax 78.3
61% 93.2 fps
MRender 79.9
Gravity 75.7
Splatting 70.6
61% 75.4 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB
829GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.00C06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 64 62 66 78 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 111
Write 99.9
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 70.4
66% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 62%
WD My Passport 0827 3TB
2TB free, PID 0827
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 26 26 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 25
Mixed 24.1
SusWrite 25.5
35% 26.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
99% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GR7AFR4C-RD Samsung M393B1K70CH0-CH9 Samsung M393B1K70CH0-CH9 Samsung M393B1G70QH0-YK0 HMT41GR7AFR4C-RD Samsung M393B1K70CH0-CH9 Samsung M393B1K70CH0-CH9 Samsung M393B1G70QH0-YK0 ... 128GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.8% Excellent
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 30.9
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.4
25% 8.67 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VB1416 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

System: Cirrascale VB1416

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $76
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback