Asus Zephyrus M GU502GW_GU502GW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive260% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus Zephyrus M GU502GW_GU502GW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GU502GW
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210105
Uptime2 Days
Run DateDec 17 '21 at 00:00
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
53% Above average
Memory 90.4
1-Core 24.3
2-Core 243
63% 119 Pts
4-Core 88.4
8-Core 142
14% 115 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 53%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1881) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
3.87% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 30
Parallax 6.4
3% 13.5 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 10.2
5% 5.37 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.87%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 980 1TB
549GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1650 1575 1542 1411 1393 1655 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
260% Outstanding
Read 1,901
Write 2162
Mixed 1,410
SusWrite 1,538
395% 1,753 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 99.6
4K Mixed 71.7
190% 67.2 MB/s
DQ Read 939
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 163
246% 482 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 260%
Great: 421%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G43AB1-CTD 04EF TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
40.3% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 14.6
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 8
22% 7.77 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Zephyrus M GU502GW_GU502GW Builds (Compare 170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht

System: Asus Zephyrus M GU502GW_GU502GW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback