HP G5110uk

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP G5110uk  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2A99
Memory3.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100702
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '21 at 22:20
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X3 440-$50
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Memory 54
1-Core 44.2
2-Core 89.3
38% 62.5 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 130
15% 119 Pts
64-Core 103
6% 103 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 240
Zotac(19DA 1142) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
4.71% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2.7
5% 3.63 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 3.3
4% 4.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.71%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
405GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 56 69 69 75 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
29% Poor
Read 35.1
Write 36.3
Mixed 18
SusWrite 66.2
28% 38.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HDS721032CLA 320GB
298GB free
Firmware: JPFO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 85 81 84 83 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 104
Write 103
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 82.5
63% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
26.6% Poor
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 9.9
27% 9.47 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 7.2
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 147
27% 147 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G5110uk Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP G5110uk

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $50
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback