Lenovo 20LB0028US

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive232% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 20LB0028US  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20LB0028US
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '21 at 15:00
Run Duration364 Seconds
Run User PRI-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Memory 79.1
1-Core 90.1
2-Core 155
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 325
34% 271 Pts
64-Core 323
20% 323 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Legend(17AA 225B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.26% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 14.2
Parallax 6.4
4% 8.67 fps
MRender 8.7
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 10.3
7% 8.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.26%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
802GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1106 1136 1172 1179 1213 1213 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 1,448
Write 1,270
Mixed 1,239
SusWrite 1,170
288% 1,282 MB/s
4K Read 60.5
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 71.6
245% 82.9 MB/s
DQ Read 716
DQ Write 476
DQ Mixed 596
444% 596 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 232%
Great: 410%
SanDisk Cruzer 4GB
0GB free, PID 5406
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 24.9
Write 7.7
Mixed 4.2
12% 12.3 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
34% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFD8266.C16FE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.7% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 24.3
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 14.2
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20LB0028US Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20LB0028US

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback