Asus ROG STRIX Z590-A GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive257% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z590-A GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210421
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 16 '21 at 12:30
Run Duration280 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10850K-$279
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 95.7
1-Core 154
2-Core 307
102% 185 Pts
4-Core 606
8-Core 1,144
104% 875 Pts
64-Core 2,051
127% 2,051 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 104%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1212 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.12.1
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Lighting 18.6
Reflection 18.4
Parallax 25.3
15% 20.8 fps
MRender 27.2
Gravity 22.1
Splatting 19.7
18% 23 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$87
496GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0118C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1209 821 799 787 382 845 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
257% Outstanding
Read 2,500
Write 1,782
Mixed 1,417
SusWrite 807
362% 1,627 MB/s
4K Read 52.1
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 66.5
222% 75.7 MB/s
DQ Read 795
DQ Write 948
DQ Mixed 516
487% 753 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 257%
Great: 372%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
833GB free
Firmware: UH5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 136 122 149 122 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 452
Write 84.2
Mixed 158
SusWrite 135
45% 207 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 14.7
38% 10.5 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 58%
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
164GB free
Firmware: X41320RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 309 299 299 264 294 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 360
Mixed 283
SusWrite 302
80% 360 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 84.7
4K Mixed 33.7
135% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 195
184% 287 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 108%
Netac 128GB 128GB
40GB free
Firmware: SN6201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 392 384 339 86 86 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 473
Write 399
Mixed 386
SusWrite 280
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 83.9
4K Mixed 36.7
142% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 139
130% 197 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 82%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$87
154GB free
Firmware: 32B3T8EA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1286 937 809 937 939 941 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 2,419
Write 1,608
Mixed 1,474
SusWrite 975
360% 1,619 MB/s
4K Read 52.9
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 69.9
229% 78.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,190
DQ Write 932
DQ Mixed 628
588% 917 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 275%
Great: 372%
ST6000DM 003-2CY186 6TB
594GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 109 109 104 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 91.1
Write 101
Mixed 84.9
SusWrite 105
132% 95.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.6
192% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 66%
WDC WD30 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 3TB
727GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 105 109 109 104 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 89.8
Write 95
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 105
124% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 28.5
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 44.7
SC Mixed 29.8
91% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 55.1
73% 55.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z590-A GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 3,256 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 187%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z590-A GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback