Gigabyte GA-Z170X-UD3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics33.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive290% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z170X-UD3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170X-UD3-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '21 at 01:26
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600-$133
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 84.6
1-Core 118
2-Core 216
79% 139 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 447
59% 441 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3201) 2GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
33.8% Below average
Lighting 43.2
Reflection 45.5
Parallax 45.6
35% 44.8 fps
MRender 37.3
Gravity 41.1
Splatting 35.7
31% 38 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$92
681GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1218 1560 1602 1607 1594 803 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
290% Outstanding
Read 1,979
Write 2,090
Mixed 1,430
SusWrite 1,397
388% 1,724 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 72.9
244% 90.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,354
DQ Write 858
DQ Mixed 1,014
781% 1,075 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 290%
Great: 347%
OCZ Trion 150 480GB-$300
45GB free
Firmware: SAFZ12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 326 233 285 279 288 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 459
Write 402
Mixed 346
SusWrite 291
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 79
4K Mixed 38.4
128% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 345
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 197
188% 294 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 101%
SSK 500GB
41GB free
Firmware: 0209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 44 44 44 32 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18.7% Very poor
Read 39.7
Write 43.6
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 41.9
9% 41.6 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 14.5
4K Mixed 13.8
44% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 15.9
DQ Write 18.8
DQ Mixed 13.3
11% 16 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
178GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 116 118 116 116 117 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 182
Write 145
Mixed 83.4
SusWrite 115
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 112%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE-A 128GB
115GB free, PID 0716
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.1% Very poor
Read 17.6
Write 18.5
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 19
25% 18.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.6
108% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
79.3% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 23.4
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 23.4
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z170X-UD3-CF Builds (Compare 714 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170X-UD3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $588
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $35SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback