Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3220-$60 71,790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	62% Good	Memory 90.7 1-Core 83.9 2-Core 134 64% 103 Pts	4-Core 198 8-Core 179 26% 189 Pts	64-Core 205 13% 205 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 118B) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.63% Terrible	Lighting 4.6 Reflection 4.3 Parallax 4.1 4% 4.33 fps	MRender 3.2 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 5 3% 4.03 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.63% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 148GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 96 35 121 49 139 MB/s Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51.4% Above average	Read 233 Write 176 Mixed 206 SusWrite 94.9 40% 178 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 43.4 4K Mixed 26.3 89% 30.3 MB/s	DQ Read 199 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 143 122% 177 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HB3DU004GFM8MML16 1x4GB 53 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.2% Below average	MC Read 10.9 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 7.3 26% 9.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 11.1 SC Mixed 9.6 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 66.2 60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i3-3220Intel $60Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	1x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	1x
GeForce 8400 GSNvidiaBench 1%, 18,254 samples	1x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	1x

RAM
9905474-060.A00LF 99P5471-039.A00LF 12GBKingstonBench 38%, 1 sample	1x
1x4GBHB3DU004GFM8MML16Bench 31%, 53 samples	1x

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $88