Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706IH_FA706IH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics43.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive387% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706IH_FA706IH  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA706IH
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210312
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '21 at 22:36
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User CYP-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Memory 82.3
1-Core 146
2-Core 292
94% 174 Pts
4-Core 577
8-Core 1,079
99% 828 Pts
64-Core 1,460
90% 1,460 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Asus(1043 18CF) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.32.06
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
43.4% Average
Lighting 54.5
Reflection 53
Parallax 50.5
44% 52.7 fps
MRender 63.8
Gravity 49.1
Splatting 43.1
42% 52 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 43%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP1000GM30023 1TB
755GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SU6SM001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2418 2576 2556 2478 1672 1159 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
387% Outstanding
Read 2,164
Write 2502
Mixed 2,252
SusWrite 2,143
512% 2,265 MB/s
4K Read 67.5
4K Write 228
4K Mixed 110
364% 135 MB/s
DQ Read 1424
DQ Write 1,096
DQ Mixed 1232
929% 1,251 MB/s
Poor: 233%
This bench: 387%
Great: 504%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C20S4/16G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 42.9
MC Write 41.7
MC Mixed 35.7
115% 40.1 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 37.5
SC Mixed 22.4
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 107%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706IH_FA706IH Builds (Compare 220 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706IH_FA706IH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback