Lenovo 2555EJF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 2555EJF  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory7.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130415
Uptime7 Days
Run DateDec 15 '21 at 22:08
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2-$266
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 94.3
2-Core 178
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 472
49% 394 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650 Ti Boost-$140
EVGA(3842 3657) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
16% Very poor
Lighting 17.9
Reflection 21.4
Parallax 24.8
15% 21.4 fps
MRender 26.4
Gravity 22.9
Splatting 20.4
19% 23.2 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 57 75 72 76 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 103
Write 92.5
Mixed 57.4
SusWrite 68.4
59% 80.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
131% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 88%
Lexar JumpDrive S25 USB 3.0 32GB-$13
30GB free, PID a838
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 22 23 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 31.5
Write 22.1
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 19.4
32% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
56% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-518.A00LF 0443 RMR5030MJ68F9F1600 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.3% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 13
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 14.3
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 2555EJF Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 2555EJF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $358
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback