ADD TO PC
BUILD

Toshiba SATELLITE C855-2HW

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	76.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C855-2HW (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel PLCSF8
Memory	6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130403
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 02 '17 at 21:31
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100 61,311 User benchmarks, average bench 49% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Memory 87.3 1-Core 87 2-Core 153 66% 109 Pts	4-Core 205 8-Core 210 28% 207 Pts	64-Core 210 13% 210 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7500/7600 2,324 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Toshiba(1179 FB31) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	3.58% Terrible	Lighting 4.43 Reflection 5.08 Parallax 3.53 4% 4.35 fps	MRender 4.48 Gravity 2.97 Splatting 5.09 4% 4.18 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.58% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ AMD Radeon R7 120GB-$67 1,123 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 0 0 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 853 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1352 (AB) Unknown 100 100 40318032 (AE) Unknown 100 100 57 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (D0) Spin buzz 100 100 106 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 1 (E9) Unknown 97 97 97 (F1) Unknown 100 100 3638 (F2) Unknown 100 100 5574 (F9) Unknown 100 100 216570971	76.8% Very good	Read 517 Write 427 Mixed 455 104% 467 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 67.3 4K Mixed 22.1 94% 36.3 MB/s	DQ Read 20.9 DQ Write 54.4 DQ Mixed 13 17% 29.5 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 104%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 60,540 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 682GB free Firmware: 0502 Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	48.4% Average	Read 79.6 Write 88.9 Mixed 77 62% 81.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.84 4K Mixed 0.27 81% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GB 25,458 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	58% Above average	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 21.1 MC Mixed 18.2 58% 20.2 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 17.6 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 70.2 57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback