Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics81.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive280% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210526
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '21 at 14:14
Run Duration275 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$369
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.8 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 90.3
1-Core 174
2-Core 348
109% 204 Pts
4-Core 678
8-Core 1,117
110% 898 Pts
64-Core 1,703
105% 1,703 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.10.2
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.5% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 110
Parallax 156
85% 123 fps
MRender 91.6
Gravity 114
Splatting 75.8
75% 93.7 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
801GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2497 958 957 966 962 961 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
280% Outstanding
Read 2,234
Write 3,685
Mixed 2,328
SusWrite 1,217
535% 2,366 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 80
263% 98.1 MB/s
DQ Read 895
DQ Write 647
DQ Mixed 781
581% 775 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 280%
Great: 486%
sannobel 360GB
107GB free
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 403 405 405 405 387 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 496
Write 410
Mixed 367
SusWrite 401
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 86.8
4K Mixed 18.3
108% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 24.5
52% 103 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 82%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
198GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 297 298 298 297 297 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 451
Mixed 423
SusWrite 314
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 86
4K Mixed 54.9
181% 61.3 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 200
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 105%
Great: 124%
WD Elements 25A3 14TB
13TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 200 208 209 207 202 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 212
Write 225
Mixed 196
SusWrite 205
287% 210 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 1
390% 7 MB/s
DQ Read 0.8
DQ Write 8.9
DQ Mixed 1.4
353% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 107%
Great: 103%
WD Elements 2621 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 117 118 117 117 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 117
Write 112
Mixed 74.7
SusWrite 116
141% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.3
155% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 64%
WD Elements 25A3 16TB
3.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 163 160 164 162 162 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 172
Write 169
Mixed 148
SusWrite 162
221% 163 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 2.5
418% 5.67 MB/s
DQ Read 3.2
DQ Write 9.1
DQ Mixed 1.9
386% 4.73 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-4800C18-8GTRS 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
94.4% Outstanding
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 34.6
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 29.4
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 40.8
92% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 158%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO Builds (Compare 1,865 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 205%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 224%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $1,564
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback