MSI MS-ACB31

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMICRO-STAR MS-ACB311
MotherboardMSI MS-ACB31  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140710
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateDec 15 '21 at 13:34
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 85.6
1-Core 94.2
2-Core 177
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 519
52% 425 Pts
64-Core 511
32% 511 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 860M
MSI(1462 ACB3) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.9709
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Lighting 18.2
Reflection 20
Parallax 15.5
15% 17.9 fps
MRender 23.4
Gravity 21.6
Splatting 15.4
16% 20.1 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS128GMSA370 128GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20140402
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 140 131 128 115 132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 497
Write 151
Mixed 209
SusWrite 132
54% 248 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 23.8
4K Mixed 33.1
95% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 153
129% 191 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 78%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
267GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 78 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
43% Average
Read 71.6
Write 73.4
Mixed 15.9
SusWrite 78.2
43% 59.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
31.2% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 8.6
28% 9.83 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 10
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-ACB31 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-ACB31

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback